I fail to identify any reason why the intervention of helpers was required in the previous topic raised. A grateful user (YNWA) had volunteered to help bring a certain highly requested game to life on the QuentinC's Playroom in a most generous way, for no personal gain whatsoever. Several others publicly expressed their agreement and encouragement with the proposed idea, and a few also extended their hand of collaboration in creating and validating questions, some of which are known to be experienced and fairly credible Playroomers (excluding me :D, due to my notorious reputation of being openly critical in the opinion of certain helpers).
Aminiel, the primary developer of this whole platform permitted and approved this proposal, and gave his brief instructions on how he would recommend the matter be handled. Now, suddenly, a certain helper desires to enforce certain criterians and guidelines for the selection of potential contributors, explicitly undermining the value of an ordinary user as being unfit to take this job upon himself. This certain helper also accused YNWA of having added no substance on the topic and brewing up negativity, which I view only as constructive criticism towards things he feel are not functioning to their best and simply pointing them out, in hope of their improvement in the future.
From the above happenings, I draw my conclusion - Certain members of the helpers team are consciously or unconsciously destroying any autonomy to form in the Playroom community, and are posing as hurdles for Playroom to function as a community of users and players. Instead, they are refusing to take any accountability towards any actions, are disregarding any criticism, that too very constructive one, in my humblest opinion, being addressed to them, and seem to be dictating redundant what they term as criterians and guidelines, but what I view as regulations and impositions.
What I ask is simply this: Please allow the community to participate its tiniest bit in shaping this platform. Helpers, please accept any feedback you receive, about how players and users perceive the method of your moderation, how they like or dislike certain measures you sometimes need to justifiably and unjustifiably take, how they view on going happenings in the world of QuentinC's Playroom. Please take any feedback in your stride, and help make the Playroom a more open, democratic and amiable space, so that fellow Playroomers can shout their thoughts out on the forum without any hitches of being subdugated by those granted additional rights and powers, or rather, duties and responsibilities. Concluding the ramblings, and getting back to the subject of Quiz Party, please do not prohibit community-coordinated efforts, for just like the various successful game tournaments, Quiz Party could also prove to be a very successful initiative by the Playroom user base.
I sincerely apologize in case I offended any individual, or if I wasn't sufficiently cogent in certain points I raised, or if certain statements I made require further clarity. I hope topics do not get banned at the frequency they are being banned at as these days, and I hope the freedom of speech and expression may be a fundamental principle that QuentinC's Playroom, hopefully as a gaming community, could enshrine and constitue. Last of all, I do hope together, we can make Quiz Party a reality!