I am wondering if any of these were not true, weren't you the one who came to comment on a post that doesn't relate to you with the only purpose of attacking?
weren't all of the following attacks?
"Marina, with support and without trying to attack anyone, I'd ask the following. How does favouritism relate here? Nobody called you out because of that, but why does favouritism come in your mind the very first second? Why are you afraid of people calling you out cause of this only problem, and why are you attacking back this hardly? Thanks for answering..."
even after the explanation you again decided to continue attacking.
"Because it's true. There are a lot of people changing their names in every month. And what about me, when I changed my name but before it wouldn't have been changed, I asked with f4 if it was possible not to change it instead, so please ignore my request. Instead of answering, they changed my name. I asked it at a time when she was available, in hopes that she saw my message. But for example if I said something that would hurt the english helpers, or hell knows, for example if I swore at them, my messages would be read immediately. And no, it's not favouritism, it's just sometimes being unaware of what happens, but I don't blame anyone. Everyone has their own life, this includes admins as well, but please, when it shows that you are online, chatting with your friends, listen to the community as well."
I was just giving you the answer you asked for. Or are you always justified for attacking and don't expect an answer. Please consider and think before you start just attacking and attacking, you claimed I attacked the original poster and haven't showed me where I did.