1. LoboBranco,
It would be interesting if you had an option to disable the 15 second pause between rounds.
In very long games, such as Poker, which has more than 200 rounds, it becomes very exhausting pressing shift+p every time.
Score: +1
12 messages, 1 pages: 1 ↖ Go back to topic list
Score: +10
It would be interesting if you had an option to disable the 15 second pause between rounds.
In very long games, such as Poker, which has more than 200 rounds, it becomes very exhausting pressing shift+p every time.
Score: +1
More than 200 rounds? Wow.
Score: +0
An option to bypass the 15 second wait for the start of a new round would be great. Just so long as you don't shorten it to like five seconds or something. Some of us use that time to regroup and/or take a drink of water. lol.
Score: +0
It can be optional, you can decide if you want the round to start immediately after the previous one or choose the time between one round and another.
Score: +0
Starting a round immediately after the end of the previous round is a useless idea. The table master, especially in games that require concentration like Uno, will not have enough time to pause the game using shift+P in case he or one of the players needs to pause it, such as answering a call, plugging the computer charger, etc.
Score: +0
You’re literally just pressing buttons throughout the game, two extra keys I feel is hardly an issue.
Score: +1
I think you should read the idea proposal better.The idea is to have an option to disable the 15 seconds. In Poker, for example, these 15 seconds are a nuisance.
Score: +0
Last edited by bira, Nov 7 2024 20:12:24
Fair enough i don’t play this so might be bias. But like another player mentioned above you may want that function unless you want someone to say brb in the middle of the game cos there can be things getting in the way. Pressing shift p don’t make you wait that long and you can just go to the next round. I’m sure someone is happy to do that among the table.
Score: +0
Believe me, not in Poker games. There are more than 200 rounds, there are 400 presses.
Score: +0
Very good idea, thumbs up!
Score: +0
You are saying it's a terrible idea... but I believe you’re forgetting to read what is actually being proposed here. The idea is to add an option that allows the table leader to choose how the rounds will be paused. So, whether it's a terrible idea or not, the table leader, along with the table members, can decide, in each specific situation, if it applies or not. What is optional neither harms nor benefits everyone globally, while it can be an advantage for those who think it applies to them. Those who still believe it's a terrible idea use the default behavior, while others use what suits them best.
Score: +1
And one more suggestion that has not been responded to by the moderators
Score: -1
12 messages, 1 pages: 1 ↖ Go back to topic list
You must be connected in order to be allowed to post.