1. supanut2000,
Hi,
So other than restoring secure connection, are there any other new features coming in Playroom 3.0, and if so, what sort of new features can we expect?
Score: +0
57 messages, 2 pages: 1 2 ↖ Go back to topic list
Score: +1
Hi,
So other than restoring secure connection, are there any other new features coming in Playroom 3.0, and if so, what sort of new features can we expect?
Score: +0
Please add Turkish language
Score: +0
Hello,
It would be fun to see all what you imagine for that new version. :P
If you have any request for the client, that doesn't need too much work, that's the good time to post it now.
For the moment, I prefer don't give a list of precise features to come. First because I'm not yet fixed on everything, and secondly because it's fun to leave the surprise still for a while.
Score: +2
Hello,
alright, here are some of my wishes, though they probably don't fall into not requiring too much work category :P
I believe that's it for now, and regardless of the state of the features mentioned above, definitely looking forward to the new beta and wishing you good luck!
Edit: I also agree with one of the things Fawaz mentioned below, if possible, when pressing right or left arrows to navigate between card suits or right arrow to expand a table, don't repeat the currently focused item first and then announce a new one.
Score: +1
Last edited by Nikola, Feb 7 2021 15:13:04
Hi,
I would love to see ability to configure the default options for each game for each account, so i change my uno default settings, every time i just can click yes on the first option, and it gives the options i have configured previously.
Chat channels being open to all seems a hopeless case, but still it is in my wish list haha.
jumping to first and last card with control up/down as it was previously would be cool too.
when expanding a table with plenty of players from outside with the right arrow, it will be nice to announce the continuation without repeating the information all over again twice or so.
not sure any of these are easy to do but this is the list from top of the head :D
good luck!
Score: +1
I'm sure I had more than one idea in mind, but the only one that hits my mind right now is, maybe adding the possibility of seeing more than the, I think, 32 posts we are able to see using the client? Applies for the forum and for permanent messages.
Score: +1
Here are some of the features I like to see in the 3.0 release:
Score: +1
Hello,
the second feature is already present. When a spectator joins, it will say, Howard has joined the table as a spectator.
For the first remark, simply open your friends list and press Ctrl m on the one you'd like to message and the chat box will be filled with @and their username.
The third one will probably not happen, since Chess bots require too much server power, but there have been talks about client side Chess bots so it's not imposssible.
Score: +1
Oh really? Is the second feature I mentioned in my last post already in the current Playroom client?
Score: +0
There's many, but I never wrote them down ever unfortunately so for now will mention the only that comes to mind (partly due to experience a cupple seconds ago).
Please, for the love of god increase the status char limit on qc. It is rediculously low, a sentence or two to a bair maximum is all that can be expressed in the current state of things. Even more social media platforms have way way more than this.
Score: +1
Agreed @godfather. I think 90 characters is a bit on the tiny side. Of course, it is essential that status messages should be concise and not resemble essays, but that doesn't mean the maximum limit could not be increased to, say, 150-200 characters.
Speaking of new suggestions, I have a couple of my own to propose, if I may. The first one is detailed in this post: https://www.qcsalon.net/en/forum6/topic56923. I shall not reiterate what I had already said lest I bore you, but the long and short of it is that adding chat aliases would be a huge quality-of-life feature, especially for those of us who use this platform as a space to socialise.
The second one is a bit sillier and perhaps less necessary, but it would still save a bit of time for folks who have accumulated a large number of friends. I don't know how easy it would be, but it would be nice if we had the ability to manually change the order in which people appear on our friends list. I suppose one of the ways in which that could be done is in much the same way that players can be assigned to various teams before a team game begins, namely with shift and the arrows.
Lastly, I think group private messages would be a useful addition to the various ways in which peoplle can get in touch on here. Example senario: Bob is playing uno, Bill is absent on the main room, Steve is hanging out at a free table and Tom is bored out of his mind and wants all the above players to join him at a crazy 25000-point quiz party table. Rather questionable if that would help alleviate his boredom, but never mind. Point is, if group messages existed, he could somehow reach out to all his friends at once and even send them a group invite, but I don't know if the latter would be a bit too much to ask for.
Anyway, thanks for reading if you've made it here. I was not expecting this to get that long so I apologise if I've put anyone to sleep, but I would truly love to see some of this stuff implemented. Keep up the good work, qc team. This place is the bomb.
Score: +1
ithink there should be new games shush as skipbow
Score: +0
In my limited experience, new games are not necessarily released at the same time as client updates. I could be wrong there though.
Score: +1
Nice idea to ask for our suggestions here. My ideas also don't require too much work I guess.
That's it for now, looking forward to the new client.
Score: +1
I absolutely agree with those suggestions. Also another nice feature that I forgot to mention in my earlier post is the ability to perform a search, for both online users list and friends list. For people who have lots of friends, it can be hard to find a specific friend. Though the client puts onlinbe users first - which is alright, but it would've been better if we could perform a keyword search to find a specific person.
Score: +0
Well, if you type the name of your friend on the menu, or the starting letter of their username, you will jump right to where their user is. Although, I also thought of the searching feature for some reason, forgot which one now.
Also would be nice if, somehow, you could select from which message you want to send a history report to the moderators, or to decide wether you want to send private messages or table messages, this, because, sometimes some of our private conversations could get in there, and that's not really nice...
Score: +0
I'm not sure if I'm the only one who feels this way but I'd find it great if there was an option to disable that down arrow delete shortcut thing. Not sure if it's a bug or if it's an intentional feature. Sorry if that was mentioned before. That's it really
Score: +0
Hello, what is the down arrow delete shortcut? Nothing is happening if I press down arrow+delete, or delete+down arrow... could you please explain how to replicate it?
Score: +0
I think i described it incorrectly. When you're in the chat box and you hit down arrow while there's text in it, the text gets deleted. Could this be an issue on my side?
Score: +0
Right, it happens here. So the history is saved on each line, but the current text is not saved until you send the message. I think it can be possible to have it temporarily saved, and delete it only if the user sends a different message? because i have lost many messages just by a silly down arrow.
Score: +0
Yes that is exactly what I'm talking about. I tend to press down arrow to review what I've written before sending but that doesn't seem to be possible on here
Score: +0
Hello. When it will be available the new playroom client?
Thanks!
Score: +0
Another suggestion: when you block a person from a social network, you stop seeing that person, comments from that person, when the person is online, ETC... What about implementing it for PR, too? I mean, it's not fair that you block someone, yet they and you still can see where each other is and what does each other do. Of course it would apply for the one that blocks, and for the blocked one. Any thoughts?
Score: +0
I agree with this suggestion.
Score: +0
Some of these suggestions are playroom suggestions and not really PR 3 suggestions as they can be implemented in version 2 or 3 if Aminiel agrees with the suggestion. Your status message is one example where if he wanted to change it tomorrow he could but it won't really change that much to the experience you already get and I am guessing he isn't really looking for that kind of thing in terms of bringing PR3 forward.
In RS if you play a person in a game who you have blocked you don't see their comments or they don't see your comments so you wouldn't know if they have said something rude/insulting about you to one of the other players you are playing with unless it is later reported to you by one of the other players in your game. Imagine the other players are laughing and you don't know why? It could be something normal or they could be laughing at your expense and that's why I would rather keep it it as it is.
Score: +0
Then an exception could be free tables where you meet, because on forums this wouldn't happen, since there are admins, mods and players willing to report it, thus that problem would be avoided. Whether it's a playroom suggestion or a playroom3 suggestion, it's at the end a suggestion, and probably not hard to code, as @Aminiel specified he would like those suggestions to be.
Score: +0
how about a mac client as the web client not flexible enough to allow shortcuts?
Score: +0
Hello,
Other suggestions I recall from the whole discussion so far aren't specific for the client.
I don't know what to say for chat aliases and/or channels yet. I need to analyze thorroughly the topic with other admins.
ABout blocking, it's going to be totally inconsist if other people at your table see messages that you don't see yourself. I have had bad experiences with that on old IRC servers and don't want to reproduce the mess here. A blocked user can't talk to you directly, but still can indirectly. I think it's better to keep it that way.
Score: +2
Hello, I have heard that wx wigit works for linux too.
Does it mean that we will be able to use pr from linux?
Or there are other dependencies that need to be addressed?
Score: +1
I suggest not appearing too late in the UNO game when one of the players causes it and its points are calculated at the end of the round or that it appears to him only because it is very annoying to the players
I ask Aminiel to pay attention to this suggestion because it will improve uno very much and will enable most players to get along with playing better, because a group of players may come and press their cards repeatedly and a role not with them, which annoys the rest of the players and delays them from playing
Score: +0
57 messages, 2 pages: 1 2 ↖ Go back to topic list
You must be connected in order to be allowed to post.